쌀겨와 EM 처리시 초기 환원장해 및 잡초방제 효과에 따른 벼 수량 


이순계1*,  최현구1, 이재철1, 정종태1, 신철우1, 오세현1, 김성제2, 이장열2, 김철수3, 변종영4

충남농업기술원1, 보령 농업기술센터2, 보령 쌀연구회3, 충남대학교 식물자원학부4


Yield of Rice as Affected by Reduction Stress and Weed Control due to Rice Bran and Effective Microorganism Application in Rice Bran Culture

Sun Gye Lee1*,  Hyun Gu Choi1, Jae Choul Lee1, Chong Tae Chung1, Choul Woo Shin1, 

Se Hyeon Oh1, Seong Je Kim2, Jang Yeol Lee2, Chell Su Kim3 and Jong Yeong Pyon4

 1 Chungnam Agricultural Research & Extension Service, 2Boryeong Agricultural Technology Center, 3Boryeong Rice Research Association, and 4Chungnam National University



실험목적

화학비료의 과다의존과 지나친 농약사용으로 우리의 토양과 수질은 오염이 심각해지고 있으며 쌀수입 개방화에 따라 외국쌀과의 경쟁에서 살아남을 수 있게 하기 위해서는 환경을 보전하며 안전한 친환경농산물을 생산하여 농가 소득증대를 위한 쌀겨농법 재배기술을 확립하고자 본 시험을 수행하였다.


재료 및 방법

○ 본 실험은 2005년도 보령 키토산 친환경재배단지에서 현지시험으로 수행하였다. 시험품

종은 고시히까리를 중묘로 5월 31일 이앙하였으며 써레질을 2회 실시하였다.

시비량은 1차 써레질전 유박비료를 2,000kg/ha, 쌀겨는 써레질후 5일(이앙후 5일)에 1,500kg/ha, 이삭거름으로  N- K 비료를 14- 14kg/ha을 시용하였다. 

○ 써레질 당일에 벼를 이앙하였으며 쌀겨는 써레질후 5일(이앙후 5일)에 처리하였고 이 앙후 25일에 중경제초를 1회 실시하였다.

 초기 벼의 환원장해 및 생육을 이앙후 10일부터 10일 간격으로 50일까지 5회에 걸쳐 조사하였다.


실험결과

○ 쌀겨처리시 잡초방제효과 및 환원장해를 줄이기 위해 써레질 당일에 이앙하고 이앙후 5일에 쌀겨처리시 환원장해가 경감되었다. 

○ EM처리구에서 쌀겨처리구보다 초기 환원장해가 적어 벼의 생육이 이앙후 30일까지는 좋았는데 이는 EM에 의한 미생물이 쌀겨를 빨리 분해하였기 때문으로 사료된다. 

○ EM과 쌀겨처리후 이앙 25일에 중경제초를 1회 실시하였을 때 잡초방제효과는 EM처리에서는 중경제초를 실시하지 않았을 때 70.8%에서 84.4%로 높아졌으며 쌀겨처리구에서도 무처리에서 67.8%에서 82.2%로 높아졌다. 

○ 정조 쌀수량은 무처리구 4.26M/T/ha 대비 EM과 쌀겨의 로타리 1회 처리에서 7.39~7.44M/T/ha 으로 42.7~42.4% 증수되었다.


ꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏꠏ연락처 : 이순계  E- mail : Isoong4@hanmail.net  전화 : 041- 330- 6245



Table 1. Rice reduction stress to disorder of plants by rice bran and Effective Microorganismapplication.

Application time

Reduction stress (0- 9)

10DAT

20DAT

30DAT

40DAT

5 days after puddling (EM*)

1

0

0

0

5 days after puddling (Bran)

1

1

0

0

Herbicide

0

1

0

0

*EM : Effective Microorganism


Table 2. Growth of rice as affected by application time of rice bran and Effective Microorganism.

Application time

10DAT

20DAT

30DAT

40DAT

50DAT

Height

Tiller

Height

Tiller

Height

Tiller

Height

Tiller

Height

Tiller

5 days after puddling (EM)

27.2

5.9

32.5

15.3

57.7

18.2

67.9

18.4

78.0

18.1

5 days after puddling (Bran)

29.2

5.7

33.3

13.9

55.1

17.4

65.0

18.6

76.5

18.3

7 days after puddling (Bran)  

32.6

5.4

36.7

14.6

57.9

17.1

68.4

17.0

75.2

16.1

Untreated control 

27.5

4.4

34.2

9.3

54.4

12.3

63.0

14.1

76.1

13.7


Table 3. Weed control effect as affected by application time of rice bran and Effective Microorganism

Rice bran and EM application

Dry weight of weeds by species(g)

Efficacy(%)

Ec*

Mv

Ek

St

Others

Total

Annual

weed

Perennial

weed

Total

EM (5DAT) + walking cultivator

31.7

10.8

21.5

8.9

3.1

76.0

87.0

82.3

84.4

EM (5DAT)

62.8

24.9

28.8

13.9

4.6

135.0

73.6

68.5

70.8

Rice bran (5DAT) +walking cultivator

45.5

10.3

16.7

9.2

0.7

82.4

83.9

80.8

82.2

Rice bran (5DAT)

78.1

22.3

33.1

14.7

0.9

149.1

71.0

65.2

67.8

Untreated control 

234.6

78.9

58.1

20.6

36.3

428.5

-

-

-


*Ec: Echinochloa crus- galli Beauv.      Mv: Monochoria vaginalis Presl.

Ek: Eleocharis kuroguwai Ohwi.        St: Sagittaria trifolia Rottb.


Table 4. Yield and yield component of rice as affected by planting density of rice in rice bran and Effective Microorganismculture.

walking cultivator: 25 days after transplanting

Rice bran and EM application

Culm length

(㎝)

Panicle length

(㎝)

No. of panicle

/hill

Spikelets

/panicle

No. of

Spikelets

m2 (×100)

Field

lodging

(0 ~ 9)

Ripening (%)

paddy

Yield

(MT/ha)

EM (5DAT) + walking cultivator

78.4

19.0

18.0

101

404

3

92.4

7.44

EM (5DAT)

74.3

19.5

15.9

97

342

3

91.4

6.79

Rice bran (5DAT) + walking cultivator

77.7

18.8

18.3

97

394

3

93.6

7.39

Rice bran (5DAT)

75.2

19.4

15.2

93

314

1

91.0

6.81

Untreated control 

74.7

18.9

13.6

85

257

1

91.6

4.26